T-Mobile US
Through the investors’ lenses
Each of these investors has said in public what they look at before buying. Click a name to see how this company measures up — a tick where it passes one of their tests, a cross where it does not.
Warren Buffett 3/4
| Measure | TMUS | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Owner earnings | $14.54bn | positive | ✓ |
| Return on equity | 18.6% | median 11.7% | ✓ |
| Debt to equity | 1.37x | median 0.79x | ✗ |
| Operating margin | 20.7% | median 15.0% | ✓ |
Passes 3 of 4. To be clear: Warren Buffett has never said anything about T-Mobile US. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →
Terry Smith 3/4
| Measure | TMUS | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Return on capital employed | 13.0% | median 10.1% | ✓ |
| Cash conversion | 2.54x | median 1.78x | ✓ |
| Operating margin | 20.7% | median 15.0% | ✓ |
| Debt to equity | 1.37x | median 0.79x | ✗ |
Passes 3 of 4. To be clear: Terry Smith has never said anything about T-Mobile US. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →
Charlie Munger 3/3
| Measure | TMUS | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Return on capital employed | 13.0% | median 10.1% | ✓ |
| Return on equity | 18.6% | median 11.7% | ✓ |
| Operating margin | 20.7% | median 15.0% | ✓ |
Passes 3 of 3. To be clear: Charlie Munger has never said anything about T-Mobile US. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →
Chuck Akre 2/4
| Measure | TMUS | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Return on equity | 18.6% | median 11.7% | ✓ |
| Debt to equity | 1.37x | median 0.79x | ✗ |
| Cash conversion | 2.54x | median 1.78x | ✓ |
| Return on equity, sustained | 6 of 10 | 8 of 10 above median | ✗ |
Passes 2 of 4. To be clear: Chuck Akre has never said anything about T-Mobile US. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →
Philip Fisher 4/4
| Measure | TMUS | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating margin | 20.7% | median 15.0% | ✓ |
| Net margin | 12.4% | median 10.2% | ✓ |
| Return on capital employed | 13.0% | median 10.1% | ✓ |
| Operating margin, held or improving | 20.7% | 10-yr median 12.0% | ✓ |
Passes 4 of 4. To be clear: Philip Fisher has never said anything about T-Mobile US. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →
Walter Schloss 0/2
| Measure | TMUS | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current ratio | 1.00x | median 1.25x | ✗ |
| Debt to equity | 1.37x | median 0.79x | ✗ |
Passes 0 of 2. To be clear: Walter Schloss has never said anything about T-Mobile US. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →
Benjamin Graham 1/2
| Measure | TMUS | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current ratio | 1.00x | 2.00x published | ✗ |
| Long-term debt to working capital | — | 1.00x published | — |
| Positive earnings, ten years running | 10 yrs | 10 published | ✓ |
Passes 1 of 2. To be clear: Benjamin Graham has never said anything about T-Mobile US. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →
Joel Greenblatt 1/1
| Measure | TMUS | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Return on capital employed | 13.0% | median 10.1% | ✓ |
Passes 1 of 1. To be clear: Joel Greenblatt has never said anything about T-Mobile US. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →
Peter Lynch 1/2
| Measure | TMUS | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt to equity | 1.37x | median 0.79x | ✗ |
| Net margin | 12.4% | median 10.2% | ✓ |
Passes 1 of 2. To be clear: Peter Lynch has never said anything about T-Mobile US. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →
| Basis | Payout | Why |
|---|---|---|
| GAAP earnings | 39.1% | whyThe figure most screeners publish. |
| Operating cash flow | 14.7% | whyBefore capital spending. |
| Free cash flow | 22.9% | whyAfter maintaining the business. |
Spread between highest and lowest: 24.4 percentage points. Same filings, different denominators.
Coverage rating 35 / 100 — Strained. ? Peer standing 30/50Direction 4/30Stability 1/20
Against its own history: 22.9% this year vs 8.5% median over the prior 3. A gap this size is usually a one-off — acquisition, settlement, cyclical trough — not a dividend that stopped being funded. The rating reads the latest year; the table shows the trend.
Free cash flow payout, last 4 years
| Fiscal year | Payout |
|---|---|
| 2025-12-31 | 22.9% |
| 2024-12-31 | 24.5% |
| 2023-12-31 | 8.5% |
| 2015-12-31 | 8.0% |
60% of the 25 communications here pay out more.
The arithmetic
- GAAP earnings — dividends declared per share $3.80 ÷ diluted EPS $9.72
- Operating cash flow — dividends paid $4,121m ÷ operating cash flow $27,950m
- Free cash flow — dividends paid $4,121m ÷ (operating cash flow $27,950m − capex $9,955m)
Where the figures came from
- 10-K filed 2026-02-11 · accession 0001283699-26-000010
All public at sec.gov — you should not have to take our word for it.
Computed straight from SEC XBRL. A number that looks wrong to you is more useful to us than agreement — tell us.
What the free cash flow payout ratio measures, and where every company here sits on it.
Also on: rated strained · when it files.
When this changes
Every figure above is recomputed whenever T-Mobile US files. The monthly letter carries what filed, what moved, and one finding computed across every company here.