Mckesson
Through the investors’ lenses
Each of these investors has said in public what they look at before buying. Click a name to see how this company measures up — a tick where it passes one of their tests, a cross where it does not.
Warren Buffett 1/2
| Measure | MCK | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Owner earnings | $4.61bn | positive | ✓ |
| Return on equity | — | median 11.7% | — |
| Debt to equity | — | median 0.79x | — |
| Operating margin | 1.5% | median 15.0% | ✗ |
Passes 1 of 2. To be clear: Warren Buffett has never said anything about Mckesson. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →
Terry Smith 1/3
| Measure | MCK | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Return on capital employed | 142.7% | median 10.1% | ✓ |
| Cash conversion | 1.29x | median 1.78x | ✗ |
| Operating margin | 1.5% | median 15.0% | ✗ |
| Debt to equity | — | median 0.79x | — |
Passes 1 of 3. To be clear: Terry Smith has never said anything about Mckesson. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →
Charlie Munger 1/2
| Measure | MCK | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Return on capital employed | 142.7% | median 10.1% | ✓ |
| Return on equity | — | median 11.7% | — |
| Operating margin | 1.5% | median 15.0% | ✗ |
Passes 1 of 2. To be clear: Charlie Munger has never said anything about Mckesson. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →
Chuck Akre 0/1
| Measure | MCK | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Return on equity | — | median 11.7% | — |
| Debt to equity | — | median 0.79x | — |
| Cash conversion | 1.29x | median 1.78x | ✗ |
Passes 0 of 1. To be clear: Chuck Akre has never said anything about Mckesson. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →
Philip Fisher 2/4
| Measure | MCK | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating margin | 1.5% | median 15.0% | ✗ |
| Net margin | 1.2% | median 10.2% | ✗ |
| Return on capital employed | 142.7% | median 10.1% | ✓ |
| Operating margin, held or improving | 1.5% | 10-yr median 1.1% | ✓ |
Passes 2 of 4. To be clear: Philip Fisher has never said anything about Mckesson. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →
Walter Schloss 0/1
| Measure | MCK | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current ratio | 0.85x | median 1.25x | ✗ |
| Debt to equity | — | median 0.79x | — |
Passes 0 of 1. To be clear: Walter Schloss has never said anything about Mckesson. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →
Benjamin Graham 0/2
| Measure | MCK | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current ratio | 0.85x | 2.00x published | ✗ |
| Long-term debt to working capital | — | 1.00x published | — |
| Positive earnings, ten years running | 5 yrs | 10 published | ✗ |
Passes 0 of 2. To be clear: Benjamin Graham has never said anything about Mckesson. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →
Joel Greenblatt 1/1
| Measure | MCK | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Return on capital employed | 142.7% | median 10.1% | ✓ |
Passes 1 of 1. To be clear: Joel Greenblatt has never said anything about Mckesson. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →
Peter Lynch 0/1
| Measure | MCK | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt to equity | — | median 0.79x | — |
| Net margin | 1.2% | median 10.2% | ✗ |
Passes 0 of 1. To be clear: Peter Lynch has never said anything about Mckesson. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →
| Basis | Payout | Why |
|---|---|---|
| GAAP earnings | 8.3% | whyThe figure most screeners publish. |
| Operating cash flow | 6.2% | whyBefore capital spending. |
| Free cash flow | 6.7% | whyAfter maintaining the business. |
Spread between highest and lowest: 2.1 percentage points. Same filings, different denominators.
Coverage rating 80 / 100 — Comfortable. ? Peer standing 44/50Direction 18/30Stability 19/20
Free cash flow payout, last 6 years
| Fiscal year | Payout |
|---|---|
| 2026-03-31 | 6.7% |
| 2025-03-31 | 6.6% |
| 2024-03-31 | 8.7% |
| 2023-03-31 | 6.3% |
| 2022-03-31 | 7.1% |
| 2021-03-31 | 7.1% |
88% of the 74 industrials here pay out more — comfortable for the sector.
The arithmetic
- GAAP earnings — dividends declared per share $3.17 ÷ diluted EPS $38.38
- Operating cash flow — dividends paid $381m ÷ operating cash flow $6,155m
- Free cash flow — dividends paid $381m ÷ (operating cash flow $6,155m − capex $436m)
Where the figures came from
- 10-K filed 2026-05-08 · accession 0000927653-26-000069
All public at sec.gov — you should not have to take our word for it.
Computed straight from SEC XBRL. A number that looks wrong to you is more useful to us than agreement — tell us.
What the free cash flow payout ratio measures, and where every company here sits on it.
Also on: rated comfortable · when it files.
When this changes
Every figure above is recomputed whenever Mckesson files. The monthly letter carries what filed, what moved, and one finding computed across every company here.